What is Choice Architecture in Real Estate?
What is choice architecture?
When compared to a house that is exhibited naked and empty, real estate brokers that stage a home with lovely decorations and flowers have a greater chance of selling the property. A buyer may visualize oneself in a home with lovely décor and a cozy atmosphere far more successfully.
The buyer’s desire to purchase anything might be influenced by how it makes them feel. The consumer is presented with a choice in choice architecture, wherein one alternative is presented as more desirable than another. The customer is still free to select either option, but the way each is presented may “nudge” them toward selecting one over the other.
This notion can be applied by businesses to affect consumer decisions by improving the setting in which their target market views and interacts with a product.
For instance, a supermarket might arrange more costly branded goods above eye level and place less expensive own-brand items on the lower shelves. The client has access to both product lines, but purchasing decisions may be skewed in favor of the branded product due to the branded product’s prominence in the customer’s line of sight.
Where does the term “choice architecture” come from?
The phrase “choice architecture” originated with the 2008 book Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. Thaler’s idea contributed to his 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics.
The book’s writers discuss choice architecture as a method of carefully planning an experience to assist users in coming to the best decisions possible. Individuals are given a “nudge” toward a decision that is in their best interests, but they are still free to select any option.
According to the book, a nudge is any element of the decision architecture that modifies people’s behavior predictably without eliminating options or drastically altering their financial incentives.
The 6 components of the architecture of choice
When considering this strategy, firms should consider these six factors that impact the development of choice architecture.
1. Steer clear of attribute overload
Having too many attributes to take into account when comparing options can lead to stress in the same way that having too many options can lead to choice overload.
In the business world, a product may have many features, but they may be constrained to assist a consumer first completely understanding the important elements. For instance, when purchasing a laptop, your primary considerations might be the processing speed, screen size, and battery life. Because of this, it is typical for companies to highlight the salient features of their goods in order to facilitate comparison.
More particular specs are useful when prospective buyers are conducting research because they may wish to look into an item more after making an initial preference or because they may want information on additional features. While it’s crucial that all the information is available to make an informed decision, organizations can choose what they display and when because of attribute overload.
2. Attributes and partitioning choices
Another way that choice architecture can impact a person is by partitioning or grouping choices according to options and attributes. Sorting choices according to alternatives, or categories, differs from sorting choices according to attributes, or the characteristics of a choice. However, if options are offered in groups, both can significantly impact the decision-making process.
In the business world, the way you market your product can help it stand out from the competition and appear more advantageous when it’s up against similar products. Yogurt, for instance, might be mentally divided by the client into categories such as fruit, dessert, or plain flavors, or it can be divided based on its characteristics, such as low fat, probiotic, creamy, delicious, and flavored. When a company caters to a target demographic that is health-conscious, highlighting the product’s health-related benefits can influence a buyer to choose it.
3. Default selections
When given options, people are more likely to go with the “default” option since they have already expended the effort and time to analyze their options.
A recurring default occurs when someone makes a decision once, after carefully weighing their options at the time, and then decides to make the same decision repeatedly just because they have already given their approval. For instance, rather than going through all the selections again, if you enjoyed your last meal at the restaurant, you can decide to get the same item when you return.
Opting in and out of services are two instances of default choice architecture in action in business. People are more inclined to stick with the default setting of not receiving a newsletter when asked to opt in. It also functions the other way around. People are more likely to opt in if it is the default setting for everyone to be opted in to get a newsletter and they are prompted to opt-out.
4. Decision-making throughout time
When individuals are given options that span multiple eras, biases are at play. Since the present can guarantee a reward, people may prefer short-term gain over long-term achievement because they perceive the future as being too distant or uncertain. This explains why people would rather overindulge in unhealthy food for pleasure than save money or consume healthy food for long-term health benefits.
This component can be seen in business when some sales and offers expire quickly. The urge to buy quickly is indirectly impacted by the limited time frame under which the options are provided. Businesses can utilize communications to help customers understand the consequences of their choice for long-term benefits products and services, giving them confidence and clarity about what lies ahead.
5. Lessening the excess of options
More options provide more diversity and usefulness, but they also mean another alternative to think out, which takes time and effort. Having too many options can lead to discontent; this phenomenon is known as choice overload.
Reducing people’s choices is the first function of choice architecture. One way to achieve this is by offering decision-supporting resources that guide you toward a single option, such as decision trees or checklists. Digital search filters and buyer guides can also be useful when making decisions online.
Restricting options is not advised since it violates the idea of a person’s right to free will and could erode consumer confidence in a company or brand. The ability of the person to freely select from all of the possibilities is diminished if choices are restricted before presentation.
6. Converting characteristics
A person’s decision to purchase a good or service can be greatly influenced by the manner in which it is presented to them and the degree to which they comprehend its characteristics and benefits. A product’s feature may be completely meaningless or arbitrary, but if it translates into something the client can relate to, the product is more likely to be valued.
For instance, if a person chooses to take public transportation instead of driving their car to work, they might select an app that tracks the number of trips taken on public transportation versus another that provides information on how many trees have been saved and how much carbon footprint has been reduced. The first app’s use of evaluative labelling made it easier for the user to see the value they were receiving and increased the app’s appeal.
